:
ahahahaa...
She is darker than Halle Berry...but, many of you would praise this woman...Is she the only mulatto worthy of praise?...ahahaha..
lol...and as far as this man being a crack addict....lol...80 % of your hollywood idols are functional drug addicts...lol
Some of you on this site are weed heads..
Come with a better excuse.
Does it really f^cking matter? Man if I ever met that *** who runs this site! I swear to God! How about we play it with your boy Obama? Isn't his mother white MTO? Yeah thought so. I can't wrap my head around their backward *** thinking about mixed people yet are in love with Obama. I don't care how brown he is the man is still biracial. You cannot take away the fact that his mother is white.
Happy September... News from the Turks & Caicos:
News from the Turks and Caicos Islands for Monday September 1, 2008
Back To Today's News Commentary: Woman in threesome with TCI Premier Misick exonerates him of rape
Published on Monday, September 1, 2008 Email To Friend Print Version
By Anthony L Hall
Hon. Dr Michael Misick, Premier of the Turks and Caicos Islands (TCI), might be guilty of many crimes, but, according to a credible witness statement, rape is not one of them.
No doubt you recall the sensational allegation of rape an American woman filed against Premier Misick last March. And, no doubt, few people believed him when he issued the following denial:
“I strongly and categorically deny these false and outrageous allegations... I am confident that I will be completely and fully exonerated.”
Anthony L. Hall is a descendant of the Turks & Caicos Islands, international lawyer and political consultant - headquartered in Washington DC - who publishes his own weblog, The iPINIONS Journal, at [link to external website removed] offering commentaries on current events from a Caribbean perspective However, the signed statement of another woman -- whom I shall refer to only by her first name, Vanessa -- tends to corroborate the Premier’s denial. Not least because she claims to have not only witnessed but also participated in the sexual acts that gave rise to the allegations.
Specifically, Vanessa states that she and the Premier began a sexual relationship in Paris sometime in February. Further, that she was a houseguest at his residence in TCI on March 28 when the alleged rape occurred. She confirms that the Premier’s wife, First Lady LisaRaye, was traveling at the time.
Vanessa states that the Premier threw a party at which “everyone was having a good time drinking and singing and going into the pool.” And that at some point, just she and the Premier’s accuser – whom I shall refer to only by her first name, Cynthia - ended up in the pool together.
Vanessa states that after a little girl talk, Cynthia suggested they get naked. She notes here that fellow partiers “Mike Pernod and Andrew Ashcroft walked by the pool at one point and saw them but left after saying hello.”
Vanessa states that Cynthia then “surprised” her with a kiss on the lips. And that they then proceeded to engage in *** *** acts that “went on for a long time.”
Vanessa states that at some point the Premier arrived and saw them in flagrante delicto. Further, that she invited him to join in the fun and that he took off his clothes and jumped right in. At this point, she claims that their ménage-a-trois involved her having “sexual contact even while Cynthia was having sexual intercourse with the Premier.”
Vanessa states, more to the point, that:
“...at no time during their sexual encounter did she hear any complaints from Cynthia....”
Vanessa then states that after a while, they “all agreed to continue inside the guesthouse,” but soon they all fell asleep.
Vanessa states that she heard the Premier get up and leave the next morning. And that when Cynthia finally got up Vanessa “asked how she was feeling and started to talk about all the *** with her and the Premier.”
Vanessa states that she was “very hurt” when Cynthia became “uptight and agitated”; especially when Cynthia insisted that:
“...she didn’t remember anything about that and she has a boyfriend and... she doesn’t do that...”
Vanessa ends her statement by noting that “the Premier along with Ashcroft came to the guesthouse” later that morning. And that after pleasantries, during which “Cynthia didn’t say anything” to the Premier about being raped, Ashcroft drove her to her hotel at Nikki Beach.
And that’s the material thrust of her statement! (Incidentally, I have omitted the more pornographic parts of her statement in the interest of public decency.)
Of course, acquaintance rape (or date rape) is notoriously difficult to prosecute – as the prosecutor in the William Kennedy Smith case can readily attest. But this is because such “she said, he said” cases rarely have eyewitness testimony that can corroborate either the allegation of the accuser or the denial of the accused.
In this case, I can’t imagine any prosecutor filing charges, let alone winning a conviction, against the Premier given Vanessa’s statement. Moreover, it renders waiting for FBI forensic evidence a complete waste of time since any finding would be entirely consistent with consensual ***.
Which brings me to TCI Attorney General Kurt Defreitas; because TCIanders have been waiting anxiously for over five months for AG Defreitas to either charge the Premier or announce that there is insufficient evidence to do so. Moreover, I believe there is not only compelling public interest in putting this matter to rest, but also a categorical imperative to remove the cloud of suspicion from our Premier if prosecuting him has virtually no prospect of success.
That said, I am acutely mindful of widespread suspicion that the Premier paid off Cynthia (with either millions of US dollars or acres of Crown land) to recant her allegations. And I appreciate that many will immediately suspect that he paid Vanessa to provide this exculpatory statement as well.
However, the problem with these suspicions is that, even if true, the alleged payoffs would expose the Premier only to charges for witness tampering and obstruction of justice. Because they would also fatally compromise any indictment against him for rape since Cynthia’s credibility as a victim, having accepted the payoff, would be irremediably impeached.
Accordingly, I urge AG Defeitas to quell the fury of speculation over this rape case by issuing an immediate statement either assuring the public that there is just cause to continue the investigation, or conceding that there is not. In addition, it behooves him to indicate if Vanessa’s statement has already been factored into the investigation, or if it constitutes newly discovered evidence which might finally compel him to drop the allegations against the Premier - as I believe justice now demands.
That said, I also feel obliged to urge AG Defreitas to re-examine his decision not to prosecute the Premier on assault and obstruction of justice charges stemming from his alleged assault of Mr. Arthur Robinson MP last year. Because I believe there is (was?) sufficient (direct and ***) evidence in that case to convict him.
Not to mention that, arguably, there is more compelling public interest in holding the Premier to account for his alleged assault of Robinson than for his alleged rape of Cynthia.
NOTE: I am reliably informed that members of the Commission of Inquiry into government corruption in the TCI are currently conducting extensive forensic investigations into the business and banking activities of government officials and other suspect individuals. Furthermore, that this phase of the Inquiry will continue for several more weeks -- at which time select individuals will be invited to give oral testimony.
But bear in mind that this Commission will have access to all of the evidence TCIslanders submitted to the UK Foreign Affairs Committee a few months ago.
I don't know why Lisaraye got so upset? She acted like this type of thing isn't her cup of Tea? Now give this *** a break and concentrate on other things. Everybody is Human, and Lisa cannot deny that she never participated in a 3some!!!!
@chelle_bee_kelsFAN
It matters because it gives us folk that come to this website something to do. Now *** up and watch your mouth.
Okay, now getting back to the more important question at hand: I think she's a bunch of stuff all mixed together. I don't think we would ever be able to pin her complete racial make-up down. If I were to guess, it would be Italian, Indian, and some white European. Whatever it is, it's a very nice combination, she's pretty.
WHY THE *** DOES THIS MATTER??
Funny, cuz I always get people who just meet me telling me I look Italian or Greek...cuz I have a "white girl" face but I have some color and curves, yet I'm from the opposite side of the world.
She, like many people on this eath is probably mixed up with different races/ethnicities. What's the big deal again???
Some of you Folk's including MTO need to go to. or back to school. the definition of ethnicity is, "ethnicity (***) a term which represents social groups with a shared history, sense of identity, geography and cultural roots which may occur despite racial difference." No one on this post knows what 'ethnicity' the Young Lady is just by looking at some pictures, and as far as her race concerned, who the flock cares! the only race that exists is the Human Race.
definition courtesy of Ask.com
IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT ETHNICITY SHE IS!She's nice......real nice and she look's like she aint got no funkywear's on!See! i think ladie's don't wear underwear these day's because they sweat & stank them up too fast so i call them funkywear's!And then!they got a nerve to wear g string's,thong's or whatever you wanna call them and do you know how much azz and coochie funk is stored in that one little string at the end of the day?
No wonder this website isn't getting the respect it "deserves"!! because stupid questions like this! Who gives a good *** what she is? If a real mainstream blog site were to do a something like this, there would be an uproar. But notice MTO isn't because no one cares about this site. Man I'm trying to support black media, but *** like this gotta stop for real. WOW.
For all of you saying that she is Black because of her hair...not all Blk ppl have nappy hair. Y'all know dat...and besides, I don't see any naps. BTw- if she is spanish-latin, indian or "arab", then she is caucasian. She looks multiracial like me so i'd have to say she looks ambiguous but still with mostly white admixture. That's atleast 70% White
