: Yesterday, MediaTakeOut.com located documents on the official DeKalb County, Georgia website which showed that an Atlanta man with the same name and same birth day (but different year) as rapper J Futuristic was ACCUSED of child abuse. The same website, which is owned by the GOVERNMENT and publishes only official records, showed mugshots of the man - and he looked a lot like J Futuristic.
Well today, we received a copy of J Futuristic's driver's license, photo'd above, which shows that J Futuristic's birth date does not appear to be the same as the man charged with the crime.
We're really glad to hear that, cause we were HOPING and PRAYING that he ain't do nothing . . .
Fred you irresponsible motherfcuker!!
This is what you should have done BEFORE printing that thinly veiled accusation yesterday, you dumb ***!
If you pulled this *** on anyone of them famous white boys, your *** would be sued for assisnation of character and rightfully so!.....I hope Eddie Miller's camp follows suit.
Imma say 1 thing though....
I've just checked the photos you have on the original post: which is the photo of the boy arrested and a photo(presumably) of the Rapper and they are the same person. Not only do they have exactly the same features but they have exactly the same scar above the left eyebrow.....
However, you still *** have printed that *** unless you had unrefutable proof.
How much did they pay to have you change that up? Seriously there was a point where you could walk into a fleamarket and get a *** but real looking i.d. for about 50. An whats fifty bucks to a *** gettin that hot show money.? BUTTTT that doesn't excuse him... could be fake?
But i do believe that there is more to the story... never officially charged..
ThaREALDooK www.myspace.com/htownsoundinc
I still think its the same person, there are such things as fake id's and celebs lie about there age all the time.. also we dont know the whole story when he was arrested and charged for the child abuse he was pretty young himself whos to say the girl was a year younger then him if he was 17 and she was 16 thats considered child abuse in most states..???
MTO - Somebody musta called their peeps on you. You know I loves you BUT that is THAT MAN!! And, you know it too. Of course, like everybody say...the scar, the pics and everything is the same. But, HELLO, did you not just see one of the charges on Jun-19-00 was: GIVING FALSE NAME/FALSE INFO TO POLICE? D'UH!! LMFBO!! (Laughing My Fat Booty Off!!)
FIRST OF ALL YALL SHUD KNO THESE MFKAS CAN PUT A REAL PIC ON ANYTHING, JUST LIKE THEY CAN PUT TWO DIFF PICS TOGETHA. ANYWAY MTO R FUUCKIN LIARS AND HIS PEP PROB WAS FINA TAKE LEGAL ACTION. AND EVERYBODY SITS ROUND AND TALKS BOUT THESE FOLKS. WTF? ALL THESE STORIES R NEGATIVE TOWARD BLACK PPL. IDK, MAYB ITS JUST ME. SOME OF U NEED TO WAKE UP. TECHNOLOGY HAS COME A LONG WAY, ANYTHING CAN B DONE WIT A COMPUTER
@Divaonadime girl u so on point i agree 100% and at mbaeducated wtf is u talkin bout?! ain't nobody thinkin bout fab or his *** u must be emily da way u wilding!! and @ zatee it's just different mugshot photos from different ages it's him u know he got mad mugshots look how3 many times he been locked up!
mto jus 'happened' to come across a copy of his license??? yeah RIGHT,, its 2010 technology is advanced since j isnt really known mto came up wit that bullsh*t story that they prolly copied and pasted themselves && now they prolly bout to get sued so theyre tryna cover their *** SMH. mto make blk ppl look lik killers, rapist && white women lovers
WELL SOMETHING IS REAL *** UP HERE CAUSE IF HE WAS BORN IN 85 THAT MEANS THAT WAS "HIS" JUVY RECORD WHICH ISNT AVAILABLE TO PUBLIC AT ALL. ALL JUVENILE COURT RECORDS ARE SEALED TO PUBLIC BUT THOSE WERE DEF HIS PICS WITH SAME CASE NUMEBRS MATCHING CASE NUMEBRS WITH SAME BIRTHDATE. IF HE WAS REALLY BORN IN 85 HIS PICS FROM JUVENILE CHARGES WOULDNT BE FOUND PERIOD. SOMEBODY WITH RESOURCES BETTER THEN MTO'S BS NEEDS TO LOOK INTO THE *** BETTER. *** DOESNT ADD UP AT ALL.
THE PUBLIC CANNOT GET A PERSON JUVENILE RECORDS SO IF HE WAS BORN IN 85 AND THOSE CHARGES ARE FROM 98-02 HE WAS A JUVENILE THEN SO THAT MEANS HIS PICS EVEN IF THE CHARGES AND NAMES ARE MIXED UP WITH DIFFRENT PPL HIS PICS THEM SELFS IF HE WAS A JUVY THEN COULD NOT BE SEEN BY US. JUVENILE RECORDS ARE SEALED TO PUBLIC. SOMETHING ISNT RIGHT HERE. *** YALL HAVE ZERO COMMON SENSE.