: LaLa and a young man were photo'd out in LA . . . holing hands.
Oh, and FYI . .. . We're about 99.99% sure that dude is one of LaLa's GAY buddies.
Now see ya'll......this is an example of "he could be ***" or he could be just lying to her. Those boots don't say ***, they say "angry teenage white kid" so I have no clue what's going on. The outfit could swing either way, because their are grown men (mostly latino or white boys) who dress like this, so if I was Carmelo, I would keep an eye on that @ss!
WHAT'S THE BIG ISSUE WITH HER HOLDING HER *** FRIEND'S HAND? GIRLS ARE ALWAYS SEEN HOLDING THEIR BEST *** FRIEND'S HAND WALKING DOWN THE STREET!!! THIS IS NOTHING NEW......GIRLS AND *** GUYS MAKE THE BEST OF FRIENDS ANYWAY......CUZ MOST CHICS ARE HATERS ON YOU IF YOU'RE A FLY-*** GIRL, AND STR8 DUDES ARE TO *** CHILDISH!!
Please MTO. Give that "celebrity socialite" term a rest. LaLa came from entry-level radio and TV chica status and married a baller. Look at her friends and relatives. These are not "socialites." Get dictionary. These hoodrats in the spotlight may have become "celebrities," but they are NOT "socialites." That refers to those who have achieved prominence in society and social circles separate and apart from sports and entertainment or any other arena that transforms low-rent folks to penthouse dwellers. Hate to say that Kim ***, as lowdown a ho as she is, would have qualified for the "socialite" label, as would her former friend, Paris Hilton, because their families had social status before they achieved their own notoriety. Romeo? Angela Simmons? ....sorry, not "socialites." Just second-generation celebs because of their parents. Now you know Master P is as ghetto as they come. How could his son be considered a "socialite"???