: Don't get us wrong, she looks good . . in a DESPERATE HOUSEWIFE/REAL HOUSEWIFE kinda way. But when she lost her booty . . . she lost MOST of her sex appeal.
Question: How is it possible for J.Lo to lose weight including her behind, but when a lot of black women lose weight, they do not lose their behind? Answer: J.Lo never truly had a big behind--it was fake like Kim Kardashian's. So many people are "pulling wool" over people's eyes, especially my people's eyes.
That's cause Kim *** dun stole her thunder in the azz dept. Lol J Lo use to be way thicker. She hasn't been thick like her Selena days in forever tho. She's had *** reduction surgeries. This was back BEFORE the azz was seen as an asset. My uncles use to be obsessed w/ her wen she was in Selena lol. Follow me y'all @Beauty2Classic
I never knew what people were talking about when they used to make such a big deal out of her ***. It was never big, Just average size. She has a great body and she's very beautiful but nowadays everyone is injecting their *** with god knows what and that has become the standard. It's very sad and MTO glorifies it. it's people like you who give girls low self esteem. To say Jlo is average or below is just straight HATING. She is gorgeous, big booty or not and at least her body looks natural unlike these ridiculous clown chicks like nicki minaj with their over pumped stupid *** looking deformed booties trying to pass it off at real. I'm sorry, but it's true
JLO LOOKS GORGEOUS AS USUAL! AND HER BODY AND FACE ARE ALWAYS ON POINT! DID I SEE SOMEONE ON HERE DARE TO COMPARE HER TO "ANGELA BASSETT"?? JLO HAS WAYYYYY MORE *** APPEAL BECAUSE ANGELA BASSETT HAS A MAN BODY!!! AND SHES NOT SENSUAL AT ALL!! SO STOP HATING CUZ JLO LOOKS BETTER THAN YALL ON HER WORST DAY!! HA!
Her body is great. She is doing a lot of running and dance exercises, so of course her whole body (*** included) is gonna slim down. She did not loose her ***; she just firmed it up and lost weight. Anyone who has a *** and works out knows that you can end up with a smaller version of your same ***, minus all of the fat that was on top of it. Some of ya'll are so silly.
I think when Ben affleck dumped her for having too much junk in the trunk it scarred her for life lol. Now she's trying to lose her booty in order to find another lame white boy. Her acting ability was mediocre and so was her singing and dancing, so now this *** has to rely solely on her talents thus the "falling off" lol. I know she wished Selena survived those *** wounds so she can make a Selena 2 hahaha.
@JeRzHeKz
You can talk that talk, but I stand by what I said: I believe Angela Bassett has a better body than J.Lo, especially considering the fact that she is older. Also, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, which allows me to believe that Angela is an attractive woman. Stop twisting the conversation, for I never commented on the women's looks, but if you want to go there, I find Angela to be an attractive woman. Also, I can careless about either woman's financial situation , for I do not worship or live for money--green does not make my head spin--it spins your head.
@DrKG
Hate to inform you, but the explanation you gave is not always correct or the same for everyone, especially sprinters. Yes, if a runner, particularly a sprinter, works out, he or she should expect to lose weight and tone up, but losing behind is not the case if they are running or sprinting--Jamaican, female sprinters are case in point. Actually, people who run 400 meters down to 100 meters normally have plump behinds, for they tend to have more Gluteus Maximus than fat. As a result of the constant pushing and pulling on their *** muscles while running, their Gluteus Maximus become stronger, firmer, and bigger (in most cases), which gives these particulars runners the allusion of having big behinds (including male sprinters--examples, Maurice Green and Michael Johnson). Also, individuals who naturally have big behinds and work out, normally do not lose their butts, no, their butts tend to "stand out" more, for their body fat decreases along with their waistlines, which allows their tone, firm, plump behinds to be the center of attention. People who have natural big behinds, normally do not develop a droopy partial "ironing board" behind, especially if they sprint or dance--Yohan Blake's, and Shelly Ann Fraser's,behinds are bigger than J. Lo's and they are people who definitely work out. Come with a better explanation, for I know better.
Nice natural body she looks good a fat azz is not her *** apeal she is pretty and always is dressed fly she ain't fake like kim *** and nick facaj she ain't plumping her *** and getting implants cuz she don't need dem pr frm the bx u saw her on in living color she was real thick then she just way slimmer still on point stop giving props to fake bubble butts and realize real beauty when u see it
I WOULD TAKE 1 J-LO OVER 1MILLION BLACK WOMEN. BLACK WOMEN ARE NOT ATTRACTIVE.NOTHING IS REAL ON THEM.THEIR HAIR IS FAKE,*** ARE FAKE JUST ASK NIKKI MINAJA,THEY EVEN GET FAKE EYE COLOR CONTACTS. NOTHING IS APPEALING ABOUT BLACK WOMEN WHICH IS WHY THEY RARELY GET LEADING ROLES IN HOLLYWOOD. NOBODY WANTS TO WATCH A MOVIE WITH A NAPPYHEAD,GHETTO GREASE BAG.
@the_proverbial_hater
The mere fact that you are addressing my comment lets me know it interest you, so no need to make a fool of yourself in front of the world--we know you are attentive to my every move, for your nonsense proved it. People who know something about anatomy and physiology knows I spoke the truth.
@webstedd, how does it feel to have so many comments disputing your pathetic pov's. You get points for opinion and participation but please understand that you sound silly. Expect debate when you blog.... Especially now that you have validated, through this thread, that your thoughts are facetious....
