: In what has to be one of the STRANGEST cases we've ever heard, an arbitrator has ordered former NBA player Stephon Marbury $930K . . . for firing her after she freaked him off 5 times.
Here is how the NY Post is reporting it:
[Stephan Marbury] hired Mitchell as a “private chef” in January 2006, the same month the team and coach Isiah Thomas were hit with a $10 million sexual-harassment suit by one of their executives, Anucha Browne Sanders.
Mitchell was soon serving up more than hot meals to her boss, the papers say.
“Starbury” fired her in 2006, and Mitchell complained that she’d been the victim of sexual harassment.
Marbury said he had considered their relationship “consensual” — but offered her $900,000 to keep her mouth shut.
Marbury, however, stopped making the payments in January 2010 after he’d already shelled out about $600,000 and, at Mitchell’s request, the case went to an arbitrator.
“It is uncontroverted that during Ms. Mitchell’s employment, she had a sexual relationship with Stephon Marbury which she described as occurring on approximately five occasions,” the arbitrator found.
Mitchell said the star “made her believe that ‘keeping him happy’ was a requirement of keeping her job,” the ruling said.
The other requirement was cooking for his wife, Latasha, and their three kids.
The arbitrator awarded Mitchell $330,000, saying she could have sued Marbury or sold her story for more money than she received, and that Marbury had his eyes open when he made the deal.
So all in the chick got $930K for FIVE freak offs. These HEAUX nowadays is WINNING!!!
BLACK MEN ARE THE DUMBEST RACE ON THE PLANET...............THEY STAY LOSING! WTF you sleeping with the CHEF whilee you got a wife and kids??? Cheating ALWAYS CREATES LOSING SITUATIONS FOR BLACK MEN! Wake up fellas....look at these other dumb black men TO, Ocho and others that cheated with WHITEEEEEE TRASH..........YOU LOSE! Dont hate yall know its the TRUTH!
And what chef serves up sides of sex to keep their job??? She's so full of it! And did he sign a contract or something BC there's no mention of one. Although verbal agreements r binding, it's ultimately he say she say which is inadmissible in court.